The anime industry is no stranger to drama, but sometimes the controversies surrounding it are even more intense than the stories depicted on-screen. Here, we break down some of the most shocking anime controversies that have rocked the community.
Anime has long been a beloved form of entertainment, captivating audiences worldwide with its stunning visuals, compelling storytelling, and unforgettable characters. However, behind the scenes, the industry has faced its fair share of controversies, problematic content to industry-wide scandals, these incidents have left lasting impressions on fans worldwide. From animation studios embroiled in legal battles to voice actors caught in scandals and questionable content sparking public outcry, anime has seen plenty of headline-making moments. We’ll dive into some of the biggest anime scandals that shook the industry, shocked fans, and left a lasting impact on the community.
#Bitchigo (2018)
Studio Trigger is known for its highly acclaimed anime adaptations, but ‘DARLING in the FRANXX’ turned into one of the most divisive anime series of 2018, ‘DARLING in the FRANXX’ is often criticised for its disappointing second half, which many fans felt abandoned the strong character-driven storytelling of the first episodes in favour of rushed plot developments and an out-of-nowhere sci-fi twist involving space aliens. The pacing suffers, and the themes of love, identity, and human connection that were initially explored in-depth become overshadowed by forced melodrama and a divisive ending. The #Bitchigo controversy revolves around the character Ichigo, one of the main female leads, and her actions in Episode 14, which led to widespread fan backlash from the fandom and anime fans.
Ichigo, a childhood friend of the protagonist, Hiro, and has deep feelings for him. However, Hiro forms a strong bond with another girl, Zero Two, a mysterious and powerful Franxx pilot. Zero Two and Hiro’s relationship becomes central to the story, with many fans deeply invested in their romance. In Episode 14, tensions rise when Ichigo takes drastic actions to prevent Hiro from reuniting with Zero Two, going as far as forcefully kissing him and instructing others to stop Zero Two from reaching him. This scene angered a large portion of the fandom, as many felt that Ichigo was acting selfishly and undermining Hiro and Zero Two’s relationship.
Many fans were so enraged by this unexpected twist that they took to social media and following the episode’s release, the hashtag #Bitchigo trended across social media, particularly on Twitter (now X) and Reddit. Fans used the term as a play on her name, merging “Ichigo” with “bitch” to express their frustration. Many viewers felt that Ichigo was unnecessarily meddling and controlling, disregarding Hiro’s feelings while attempting to push her own romantic agenda. This reaction was fuelled by the emotional weight of the episode, as well as the passionate fanbase that had grown attached to Zero Two and Hiro’s relationship.
While the #Bitchigo movement was vocal and widespread, not everyone agreed with the backlash. Some fans defended Ichigo, arguing that her actions stemmed from concern for Hiro’s well-being rather than jealousy. They pointed out that Zero Two’s behaviour in earlier episodes had been aggressive and borderline dangerous, leading Ichigo to believe she was protecting Hiro rather than sabotaging him. Others criticised the toxicity of the hate campaign, noting that some fans took things too far by harassing voice actors and animators involved with the show.
Even years later, the anime’s controversial ending and the hostility from certain fans remain a topic of discussion. This incident is a stark reminder of how passionate—and sometimes extreme—anime fans can become when their favorite characters’ fates don’t align with their expectations.
False Rape Accusation Scene (2019)
The false rape accusation scene in ‘The Rising of the Shield Hero’ (2019) sparked significant controversy, although the anime adaptation successfully premiered in 2019 with fans praising the show. This scene occurs early in the story when the protagonist, Naofumi Iwatani, is falsely accused of sexually assaulting Myne a.k.a Princess Malty, leading to his downfall.
Critics and viewers were divided over the scene. Some argued that it played into harmful narratives about false accusations, which are statistically rare compared to actual sexual assault cases. Others felt that the scene was an unnecessary plot device that relied on a trope often used to evoke sympathy for male protagonists. Also, Critics argued that the show painted false accusations as a common occurrence, reinforcing harmful stereotypes.
On the other hand, supporters of the series defended the scene, arguing that it served as a key element of Naofumi’s character development. They pointed out that the story is primarily about betrayal and redemption, and the accusation set the stage for Naofumi’s struggles and growth. Additionally, some fans saw it as a critique of power dynamics and manipulation.
This led to heated debates, with some defending the anime as a unique take on redemption, while others condemned it as irresponsible storytelling. Despite the backlash, the series continued to grow in popularity and remains a divisive topic in the anime community.
Eromanga Sensei Almost Banned in Australia (2017 – 2020)
It goes without saying that this anime attracted a lot of attention in 2017 despite the fact that the majority of anime enthusiasts had conflicting opinions about the show.
But guess who else took notice of it? The Australian Classification Board, since senator Stirling Griff of South Australia demanded a review of all anime and manga currently available in Australia, raising concerns about ‘Eromanga Sensei’ (2017) in particular because he claimed it depicted “child exploitation.”
The anime and light novel series ‘Eromanga Sensei’ has been a subject of controversy in Australia, with authorities and lawmakers considering banning it due to concerns over its content. The series, written by Tsukasa Fushimi and illustrated by Hiro Kanzaki, follows the story of a teenage light novel author and his reclusive stepsister, who secretly illustrates risqué artwork under the pen name ‘Eromanga Sensei.’ While popular among anime fans, the series has drawn criticism for its portrayal of young characters in suggestive situations, which some argue falls into a legal and ethical grey area.
And in 2019, Australian authorities scrutinised ‘Eromanga Sensei’ along with other anime and manga titles, raising concerns over its depiction of minors. Politicians such as South Australian Senator Stirling Griff called for a review of such content, arguing that it promoted child exploitation themes. His statements led to further investigations by the Australian Classification Board, which has the power to ban media it deems inappropriate. Although ‘Eromanga Sensei’ was not officially outlawed, the discussion surrounding it contributed to increasing pressure on retailers to self-regulate, with some stores voluntarily pulling the series from their shelves.
The debate over ‘Eromanga Sensei’ highlighted a broader cultural clash between anime fans and government authorities. Supporters of the series argued that it is purely fictional and should be protected under creative freedom, while critics maintained that its content could encourage harmful perceptions of young characters. Many anime fans in Australia expressed frustration, believing the government was unfairly targeting anime and manga while ignoring similar themes in Western media. The controversy also raised concerns about censorship, with fears that stricter regulations on anime could lead to a wider crackdown on Japanese media in the country.
Things started to die down until 2020 when ‘Eromanga Sensei’ (2017) was effectively banned in Australia, sparking new discussions. The light novel series was refused classification (RC) by the Australian Classification Board in 2020, meaning it could not be legally sold or imported into the country. The reason cited was that the content was deemed to depict or describe minors in a way that violated Australia’s classification guidelines.
While the anime adaptation was not explicitly banned, the refusal of classification for the novels made it difficult to distribute related material.
Ilulu’s Character Design in “Miss Kobayashi’s Dragon Maid S” (2022)
The second season of ‘Miss Kobayashi’s Dragon Maid’ (2017 – 2022) was highly anticipated, but the introduction of Ilulu, a new dragon character, sparked outrage. Fans criticised her over-the-top breast size, arguing that it was unnecessary and inappropriate given her petite frame and childlike features.
Ilulu, a character introduced in ‘Miss Kobayashi’s Dragon Maid S’ (2022), became a subject of controversy due to her character design, particularly her exaggerated proportions. Ilulu, a chaos dragon who takes on a humanoid form, has an extremely petite frame but is depicted with disproportionately large breasts. This design sparked debates among anime fans and critics alike, with discussions revolving around themes of over-sexualisation, artistic freedom, and cultural differences in media representation.
One of the main criticisms came from Western audiences, who argued that Ilulu’s design was an example of anime’s tendency to over-sexualise female characters, particularly ones who appear childlike. Detractors claimed that her small stature, combined with her exaggerated bust size, created an uncomfortable juxtaposition that could be seen as catering to inappropriate tastes. Some viewers felt that this type of character design perpetuated harmful tropes and was unnecessary for the story’s narrative.
Conversely, many anime fans, especially those in Japan and longtime followers of Kyoto Animation’s work, defended Ilulu’s design as a stylistic choice consistent with the medium. Supporters argued that anime has always embraced exaggerated aesthetics, and Ilulu’s appearance was simply part of the fantastical nature of the series. They pointed out that ‘Miss Kobayashi’s Dragon Maid’ itself is a lighthearted, comedic show with supernatural elements, where dragons take on humanoid forms with exaggerated features. In this context, Ilulu’s design was seen as a natural extension of the show’s established artistic style rather than something inherently problematic.
Another layer of the debate focused on cultural differences between Western and Japanese audiences regarding depictions of fictional characters. While Western media often prioritises more grounded and realistic portrayals, Japanese anime and manga frequently embrace stylised, exaggerated designs without the same societal taboos. Many Japanese fans and creators found the backlash from Western audiences to be an overreaction, viewing it as an attempt to impose foreign values on a different culture’s artistic traditions.
Despite the controversy, Ilulu remained a central character in ‘Miss Kobayashi’s Dragon Maid S’ and her arc was well-received by many fans. Her development, which explored themes of acceptance, loneliness, and finding a place in the human world, resonated with audiences beyond her initial design debates. Over time, the controversy largely faded as viewers became more engaged with her character rather than focusing solely on her appearance.
Tatsuki Fired And Removed As Director For Kemono Friends (2017)
The firing of Tatsuki, the director of ‘Kemono Friends’, was one of the most controversial moments in the anime industry, sparking outrage among fans and raising questions about industry politics. Tatsuki, part of the animation studio Yaoyorozu, played a pivotal role in transforming Kemono Friends from an obscure mobile game adaptation into a surprise hit in 2017. Despite the show’s low production budget, Tatsuki’s direction, writing, and passion made it a beloved series. However, his abrupt dismissal from the project later that year led to widespread backlash, as fans demanded answers from Kadokawa, the company managing the ‘Kemono Friends’ franchise.
The controversy erupted in September 2017 when Tatsuki announced on Twitter that he and his team at Yaoyorozu had been removed from Kemono Friends without prior notice. This shocked the anime community, as Tatsuki was widely credited for the show’s unexpected success. Fans quickly rallied behind him, trending hashtags in support of his work, and even some industry professionals expressed their confusion and disappointment. Kadokawa’s vague response—citing “communication issues” and a lack of approval for certain creative decisions—only fuelled further speculation and anger.
One of the rumoured reasons for Tatsuki’s firing involved a short ‘Kemono Friends’ animation that Yaoyorozu had released without Kadokawa’s formal approval. Some believed this was a sign of creative conflicts between the studio and the company, with Kadokawa possibly wanting more control over the franchise’s direction. Others suspected that corporate politics, including Kadokawa’s preference for working with larger studios, played a role in the decision. Regardless of the exact reason, the move was seen as a betrayal of the passionate team that had made ‘Kemono Friends’ a hit.
The fallout from Tatsuki’s removal had lasting effects on the ‘Kemono Friends’ franchise. The second season, produced without him, received overwhelmingly negative reactions from fans. Many criticised its animation, storytelling, and lack of the charm that had defined the first season.
Meanwhile, Tatsuki went on to direct ‘Kemurikusa’, an original anime that retained a loyal fanbase from ‘Kemono Friends’. His departure ultimately marked a significant moment in anime history, highlighting tensions between creators and corporate decision-makers and showing how passionate fan support could challenge industry norms.
‘Endless Eight’ & Aya Hirano (2009)
‘The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya’ (2006–2009) was one of the most influential anime of the late 2000s, but its second season alienated fans with the infamous ‘Endless Eight’ arc.
‘The Endless Eight’ controversy from ‘The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya’ is one of the most infamous events in anime history, frustrating and bewildering fans when it aired in 2009. This arc is particularly notable for its unconventional storytelling method, in which nearly identical episodes were repeated eight times, with only minor variations. To understand why it became so controversial, it is important to look at the context of the anime, the in-universe explanation for the repetition, and the reaction from the audience.
The ‘Endless Eight’ arc is based on a short story from ‘The Rampage of Haruhi Suzumiya’, a light novel volume by Nagaru Tanigawa. The story follows the main characters—the SOS Brigade—as they experience the last two weeks of their summer vacation. However, due to Haruhi’s subconscious desire for an endless summer, time loops continuously, trapping the characters in an endless cycle. The only one who retains memories of previous loops is Yuki Nagato, an artificial humanoid interface, who gradually becomes emotionally drained after experiencing the same events over 15,000 times.
In the original light novel, this story was relatively short—about 30 pages long. It conveyed the idea of an endless, inescapable loop without lingering excessively on the repetition. However, Kyoto Animation made a bold decision in the anime adaptation: instead of resolving the arc in a single or two-episode format, they stretched it across eight nearly identical episodes.
At first, viewers were intrigued by the concept, expecting the loop to be resolved in the next episode or two. However, by the third or fourth iteration, frustration started to build. Each episode featured minor changes in dialogue, clothing, and camera angles, but the core events remained largely unchanged. The SOS Brigade would go through their summer activities—swimming, festivals, part-time jobs—before Kyon, the protagonist, failed to realise the key to breaking the loop, forcing the cycle to restart.
As weeks went on, the anime’s pacing became a test of patience for the audience. Fans who had waited three years for the continuation of ‘Haruhi Suzumiya’ after the hit 2006 season felt betrayed. Many expected fresh content but instead were stuck in a real-time loop of their own, reliving essentially the same episode over and over. Some accused Kyoto Animation of laziness, thinking they reused animation assets to cut costs (which was untrue; each episode was actually animated uniquely). Others theorised that this was an elaborate artistic experiment meant to make the audience feel the frustration of the characters trapped in the loop.
The reaction to ‘Endless Eight’ was overwhelmingly negative. Anime forums exploded with complaints, and long-time fans of Haruhi Suzumiya threatened to drop the series entirely. Some viewed it as an insult to the audience, while others simply found it tedious. The controversy overshadowed much of the excitement for the second season, leading to a significant dip in enthusiasm for the franchise.
Meme culture also thrived during this time, with fans joking about their own endless suffering. Some viewers even created guides recommending which episodes to skip to avoid the monotony while still understanding the plot. Kyoto Animation’s decision to animate eight nearly identical episodes remains one of the most baffling choices in anime history.
With time, some fans have reevaluated Endless Eight and argue that it was a bold storytelling experiment. The repetition forces the audience to experience the frustration and despair of the characters, particularly Yuki Nagato. By the end, when the cycle is finally broken, there’s a genuine sense of relief that might not have been as impactful if the arc had been shorter.
However, most still consider it a misstep, as it actively pushed viewers away. If the goal was to immerse fans in the time loop experience, it arguably worked too well. The Haruhi Suzumiya franchise, which was once at the peak of the anime world, struggled to maintain its momentum afterward, and the decision to spend eight weeks on the same content is often cited as a major reason why.
Adding fuel to the fire, lead voice actress Aya Hirano faced heavy backlash from fans over her personal life being leaked.
Aya Hirano, a Japanese voice actress and singer, became one of the most controversial figures in the anime industry during the late 2000’s and early 2010’s. Best known for voicing Haruhi Suzumiya in ‘The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya’, Konata Izumi in ‘Lucky Star’, and Lucy Heartfilia in ‘Fairy Tail’, she enjoyed immense popularity at the height of her career. However, a combination of public perception, industry expectations, and her personal choices led to significant controversy, which had a lasting impact on her career.
One of the primary factors that contributed to the controversy was the idol-like culture surrounding Japanese voice actors. Many fans, particularly those deeply invested in anime, held strict expectations for voice actresses, especially young and attractive ones like Hirano. In Japan, there is often an unwritten rule that female idols and voice actresses should maintain an image of purity, avoiding public relationships or behaviour that might disappoint their predominantly male fanbase.
Aya Hirano, however, did not conform to these expectations. She had a strong and outspoken personality, often making blunt remarks in interviews and on social media. While this helped her stand out, it also made her a divisive figure. Things escalated when she openly discussed her dating life and personal relationships in public forums. In a 2010 interview, she hinted at having relationships with multiple older men, which clashed with the pure and untouchable image expected of her by certain fans.
The controversy reached its peak when reports surfaced that Hirano had allegedly been in relationships with several of her band members. At the time, she was pursuing a music career alongside her voice acting work and had a backing band supporting her performances. Rumours spread that she had intimate relationships with some of these musicians, with Japanese tabloids and internet forums fueling the speculation. A leaked photo of her in bed with a man, who was allegedly one of her bandmates, only intensified the backlash.
This revelation led to a massive outrage among some of her hardcore fans. Many felt betrayed, and the backlash was particularly severe on social media, where she received hate messages and criticism. Some fans even went as far as burning and destroying her merchandise. As a result of the scandal, her music career suffered a major blow, and her band was disbanded shortly afterward.
The scandal had a significant impact on Hirano’s career. Around the same time, she was gradually being phased out from her role as Lucy Heartfilia in ‘Fairy Tail.’ While official statements suggested it was due to health issues, many speculated that the controversy played a role in her diminished presence in the anime industry. After 2011, Hirano took on fewer major anime roles, and her once-thriving career in the voice acting world slowed down dramatically.
However, she did not disappear entirely. Instead, she shifted her focus to stage acting and theatre, where she found a new audience that was less concerned with her past controversies. She also continued to pursue music and television appearances, although she never regained the same level of popularity she once had in the anime industry.
Despite the controversy, Aya Hirano remains a well-known figure in the anime world, and her past roles continue to be beloved by fans. In recent years, some anime enthusiasts have reconsidered the backlash she faced, viewing it as an example of how Japan’s entertainment industry and fan culture impose unfair restrictions on women. Many believe that the scandal was overblown and that Hirano was simply being true to herself.
While her career never fully returned to its peak, Hirano has maintained a presence in Japanese entertainment, proving her resilience. The controversy surrounding her serves as a reminder of the intense pressures faced by public figures in Japan, particularly women in the anime and idol industries.
Recreating A Tragedy (2023)
‘Oshi no Ko’ is a popular Japanese manga and anime series written by Aka Akasaka known for ‘Kaguya-sama: Love is War’ (2019–2022) and illustrated by Mengo Yokoyari known for ‘Scum’s Wish’ (2017). ‘Oshi no Ko’ received praise for tackling dark themes, but one scene caused an uproar for allegedly mirroring a real-life tragedy. It debuted as a manga in 2020 and received an anime adaptation in 2023, quickly gaining popularity for its unique take on the entertainment industry. The series explores themes of exploitation, fame, corporate greed, and the emotional toll of stardom. It sheds light on how performers are often trapped in an industry that demands perfection while exposing them to intense scrutiny, online harassment, and manipulation, however many felt that one particular scene just hit too close to home.
One of the most shocking moments of ‘Oshi no Ko’—and where it strongly parallels Hana Kimura’s case—is its portrayal of online harassment, particularly in the ‘Reality Show Arc.’ In this arc, a young actress named Akane Kurokawa becomes a victim of cyberbullying after being misrepresented in a reality TV show. The show’s editing makes her seem aggressive, leading to a flood of hateful comments from viewers. Overwhelmed by the attacks, Akane attempts suicide but is saved in time.
For those who are unaware, Hana Kimura was a popular Japanese professional wrestler who would later become a cast member on ‘Terrace House: Tokyo’ (2019–2020), a popular reality TV show produced by Fuji TV and Netflix. She was known for her bright personality and incredible talent in wrestling, particularly as part of Stardom, a women’s wrestling promotion in Japan. However, her time on Terrace House took a dark turn due to online harassment.
During the show, one specific incident involving Hana’s wrestling gear being accidentally damaged by another cast member led to a conflict that was heavily edited and sensationalised by the producers. This portrayal turned her into a target for cyberbullying, with many viewers attacking her online with hateful messages. As the harassment escalated, Hana’s mental health deteriorated, and on May 23, 2020, Hana Kimura tragically took her own life at just 22 years old.
Her death led to a major outcry over the dangers of cyberbullying and the responsibility of reality TV producers in protecting cast members from public backlash. Japan later introduced stricter regulations on online harassment as a response to the tragedy.
Kimura’s mother publicly criticised the anime for seemingly exploiting her daughter’s death for storytelling purposes. Following the backlash, the studio added a suicide prevention message before the episode aired. Despite this, the controversy left a lasting impact on both the anime and its creators.
Nobuhiro Watsuki’s Fall From Grace (2017 – 2018)
Nobuhiro Watsuki, the famed creator of ‘Rurouni Kenshin’ (1994), was once one of Japan’s most respected manga artists, known for crafting a story that blended historical fiction with compelling characters and themes of redemption. However, his reputation was shattered in 2017, Nobuhiro Watsuki was arrested in 2017 for possessing illegal pornography depicting minors.
Fans of ‘Rurouni Kenshin’ (1994) were mortified in 2017 when the headlines surfaced, the news rocked the manga & anime community, tarnishing the legacy of one of the most beloved samurai series of all time. What followed was a legal battle, public backlash, and a controversial return to the industry that continues to spark debates about accountability in entertainment.
In November 2017, Watsuki was charged with violating Japan’s laws after Tokyo Metropolitan Police found DVDs containing illegal content in his possession. Investigators revealed that he had purchased multiple illicit materials and had admitted to an attraction to young girls. His arrest sent shockwaves throughout Japan and the international manga community, as Rurouni Kenshin was not just a popular series, but one that championed moral integrity and the pursuit of redemption.
Despite the severity of the crime, Watsuki was given a relatively lenient sentence. He was fined 200,000 yen (roughly $1,800 at the time), an amount many considered inadequate given the gravity of his actions. This leniency led to widespread backlash & criticism, particularly from international audiences who expected harsher consequences for a high-profile creator engaged in such an offence. Some saw his light sentence as indicative of Japan’s relatively lax stance on child exploitation crimes compared to other countries.
As soon as news of Watsuki’s arrest broke, Shueisha, the publisher of Jump SQ, announced an indefinite suspension of his then-ongoing manga, ‘Rurouni Kenshin: The Hokkaido Arc.’ The decision to halt the series was seen as a necessary move to distance the publisher from the scandal, but it was also temporary. Unlike cases in Western entertainment where similar offenses often lead to permanent blacklisting, Watsuki was never fully cut off from the industry.
Despite the serious nature of the charges, Shueisha reinstated Watsuki’s manga just months later in June 2018. This swift return was met with mixed reactions. Some readers felt betrayed by the industry’s willingness to overlook the controversy, while others continued to support his work, arguing that his personal actions should be separated from his artistic contributions. Nevertheless, the reinstatement of The Hokkaido Arc raised ethical questions about the manga industry’s treatment of creators accused of criminal activity.
For many long-time fans of ‘Rurouni Kenshin’, Watsuki’s fall from grace created a painful dilemma. The series had been a defining part of their childhood, teaching lessons about honour, redemption, and self-improvement. However, with its creator exposed as a criminal, many found it difficult to continue enjoying the work without feeling complicit in supporting him financially.
Some fans chose to boycott ‘Rurouni Kenshin’ entirely, refusing to purchase new editions, merchandise, or the revived ‘Hokkaido Arc.’Others argued that the story and its impact remained unchanged despite Watsuki’s personal failings. This divide highlighted a broader cultural debate about whether an artist’s work can or should be separated from their personal conduct, a question that extends beyond manga and into the wider entertainment industry.
Regardless of whether ‘Rurouni Kenshin’ continues to be read and admired, Watsuki’s reputation has been irreversibly damaged. His career, once defined by creative success and the respect of his peers, is now forever linked to his criminal past. While he has been allowed to resume his work, the controversy surrounding him serves as a stark reminder of the ethical dilemmas within the entertainment industry.
The case also shed light on Japan’s legal system and its handling of child exploitation crimes, prompting discussions about whether the country’s laws are stringent enough. It also exposed the manga industry’s reluctance to permanently sever ties with disgraced creators, as long as their work remains profitable.
In the end, Watsuki’s fall from grace is a tragic example of how an artist’s personal failures can overshadow even the most beloved works. For many fans, Rurouni Kenshin will always be a classic, but its legacy is now permanently stained by the actions of the man who created it.
And while some fans chose to separate the art from the artist, others completely abandoned the franchise. Despite the scandal, ‘Rurouni Kenshin’ continues to receive adaptations, but Watsuki’s reputation remains irreparable.
This wouldn’t be the last time that prominent figures within the anime industry would come under scrutiny for their behaviour as Vic Mignogna, a voice actor known for his roles in anime like ‘Fullmetal Alchemist’ and ‘Dragon Ball Super’, became embroiled in a series of controversies in the late 2010’s. Allegations of inappropriate behaviour, including sexual harassment, were made against Mignogna by several women within the anime industry. These accusations came to light in 2019, when multiple voice actresses, including Monica Rial and Jamie Marchi, publicly spoke out about their experiences with Mignogna. The allegations ranged from unwanted physical contact to inappropriate comments. The controversy sparked a wide debate within the anime community about the line between personal conduct and professional work.
In response to the allegations, Mignogna denied any wrongdoing and claimed that the accusations were part of a larger conspiracy to tarnish his reputation. He filed a defamation lawsuit against some of his accusers, including Rial and Marchi, which further fuelled the division within the fanbase. Some fans stood by Mignogna, arguing that the allegations were unfounded or blown out of proportion, while others expressed their support for the women who came forward, condemning Mignogna’s behaviour. This split led to heated discussions on social media platforms, conventions, and within the industry itself, with many questioning how companies and fans should address allegations of misconduct within the voice acting world.
The controversy also had significant professional consequences for Mignogna. He was let go from several voice acting projects, including roles in ‘Dragon Ball Super’ and ‘RWBY’, as well as other projects with companies like Funimation. His presence at anime conventions was also severely limited, as many event organizers canceled his appearances due to the ongoing backlash. This situation highlighted the complex nature of the entertainment industry, where personal behaviour and public reputation can have a profound impact on an individual’s career, even as legal proceedings continue and debates around the matter persist.
Another infamous account is Scott Freeman, a former voice actor best known for his work in anime dubs, Freeman had been a well-known figure in the anime industry, providing voices for popular series such as ‘High School DxD’, ‘Hetalia: Axis Powers’, and ‘Baka and Test’. His distinct voice and performances had earned him a loyal following. However, Scott Freeman became the centre of a major scandal in 2014 when he was arrested and later convicted on charges like Nobuhiro Watsuki, also possessing illegal pornography depicting minors. In response to the controversy, Funimation and other industry professionals took steps to distance themselves from Freeman. His characters were recast, and his contributions to various series were quietly phased out. While some shows retained his previous recordings, new projects ensured that his involvement was erased from the future of anime dubbing. The case shocked fans and the voice acting community, leading to swift consequences for his career and reputation.
However, when news and details of his arrest broke, it prompted an immediate response from his former employer, Funimation, to quickly severe ties with Freeman, announcing that they would no longer work with him and would recast any roles he had previously performed. The nature of the crimes also meant that Freeman would be required to register as a sex offender, ensuring that his actions would have lifelong consequences.
These scandals continue to remain a dark chapters in the world of anime voice acting, serving as a reminder of the hidden realities behind public figures.
Act-Age (2020)
Unlike most ‘Shonen Jump’ series, which focus on action, adventure, or sports, ‘Act-Age’ stood out for its emphasis on the world of acting and performance. The story followed Kei Yonagi, a teenage girl with a natural talent for method acting, who struggles with personal hardships while chasing her dream of becoming a top actress. Her incredible acting ability, combined with her unstable emotions, made her a fascinating protagonist, setting the series apart from typical battle-driven narratives.
The manga was praised for its deep exploration of the entertainment industry, realistic character development, and psychological depth. Shiro Usazaki’s stunning artwork complemented Matsuki’s writing, bringing emotional intensity to every scene. The series gained strong sales, high rankings in Jump, and even received stage play adaptations and merchandise. Many fans and critics believed it had the potential to become a long-running classic, possibly even receiving an anime adaptation in the future.
However, ‘Act-Age’ fans’ hopes were shattered. In August 2020, the series’ success came to an abrupt halt when Tatsuya Matsuki was arrested for indecent acts against underage girls. The news shocked fans and the manga industry alike, as ‘Act-Age’ was at its peak. Given the nature of Matsuki’s crimes, Shonen Jump swiftly decided to cancel the manga, and all future projects related to ‘Act-Age’ were scrapped. The decision was met with general agreement from both readers and industry professionals, as his actions were deemed inexcusable.
The most unfortunate victim of the situation was Shiro Usazaki, the series’ illustrator, who had no involvement in Matsuki’s crimes but saw her career and hard work collapse overnight. Many fans expressed sympathy for Usazaki, praising her talent and hoping she would find success with new projects. However, since ‘Act-Age’ was a collaborative work, its removal meant she could not continue the story alone.
The cancellation of ‘Act-Age’ had lasting repercussions. The manga was pulled from stores and digital platforms, and its planned stage play adaptation was called off. Discussions about separating an artist’s work from their actions resurfaced, but in this case, Matsuki’s crimes directly contradicted the themes of the series, making it difficult to justify its continuation.
Despite its cancellation, ‘Act-Age’ remains a fascinating case study in the manga industry. It proved that non-traditional Shonen stories could thrive, and Usazaki’s artwork continues to be admired. Many fans continue to mourn the series’ abrupt end, but given the circumstances, most agree that its cancellation was the only ethical course of action.
The rise and fall of ‘Act-Age’ serves as both an inspiring and tragic story—one of creative brilliance overshadowed by personal misconduct.
The Prank That Killed Kokoro Connect (2012)
In one of the worst PR disasters in anime history, voice actor Mitsuhiro Ichiki was led to believe he had landed a role in ‘Kokoro Connect’ (2012) —only to find out it was an elaborate prank staged by the production team.
This incident caused significant backlash from fans, leading to a decline in the anime’s popularity and damaging the reputation of those involved. The situation serves as an example of how poorly executed promotional stunts can have unintended consequences.
In 2012, the production team behind ‘Kokoro Connect’ (2012) organised a public event where they invited several voice actors from the anime. Among them was Mitsuhiro Ichiki, a lesser-known actor who believed he had secured a major role in the show. Unbeknownst to him, the event was actually a setup for a prank. The staff and fellow voice actors revealed that he had not been cast as a major character but was instead given the role of “Publicity Leader,” essentially reducing his involvement to promotional activities rather than actual voice work.
Ichiki was visibly embarrassed during the event, and while some of the staff and voice actors laughed it off, many fans found the prank to be cruel and humiliating. The idea that a hardworking actor had been misled into believing he had a breakthrough role, only to be publicly ridiculed, struck a nerve with the audience. The negative reception to the stunt quickly escalated into a controversy.
Fans of ‘Kokoro Connect’ took to social media and forums to express their anger, not only at the prank itself but also at the production team for orchestrating it. Many accused the staff of unprofessionalism and bullying, especially since Ichiki was not a major celebrity who could easily recover from such a public embarrassment. Some of the anime’s voice actors, who participated in the event, were also criticised for going along with the prank, even if their involvement was unintentional.
As outrage grew, fans began boycotting ‘Kokoro Connect’, discouraging others from watching or purchasing its Blu-rays and merchandise. The controversy even extended to other works associated with the production team, further damaging their reputations. Online petitions and calls for accountability circulated, demanding apologies from those involved.
The backlash had a direct impact on Kokoro Connect’s commercial success. Despite its promising start as a light novel adaptation with an intriguing body-swapping premise, the anime struggled with low sales. The controversy discouraged many potential viewers, and even those who initially enjoyed the series found it difficult to support a production team embroiled in such a scandal. The declining interest in the anime meant that plans for a second season never materialised, and the franchise faded from relevance.
Additionally, the industry took note of how promotional missteps could backfire in the age of social media. While pranks and lighthearted jokes were common in voice acting circles, this particular incident demonstrated the importance of treating industry professionals with respect, especially in public settings.
The downfall of ‘Kokoro Connect’ is a cautionary tale about the power of public perception and the risks of unprofessional behaviour. What was intended as a humorous promotional stunt instead came across as mean-spirited, sparking outrage among fans and severely damaging the anime’s reputation. The controversy ultimately overshadowed the series itself, turning what could have been a successful franchise into a case study on how not to handle public relations in the anime industry.
Tokyo Ghoul (2014 – 2018)
‘Tokyo Ghoul’, despite its popularity and strong source material, is often criticised for how the anime adaptation failed to live up to expectations. While the manga by Sui Ishida is widely praised for its deep themes, character development, and compelling storytelling, the anime suffered from numerous issues that led to disappointment among fans. The problems range from poor adaptation choices and rushed pacing to inconsistencies in storytelling and production shortcomings.
One of the biggest reasons ‘Tokyo Ghoul’ failed was its deviation from the manga. The first season followed the source material relatively well, albeit with some minor omissions, but things drastically changed in ‘Tokyo Ghoul √A’ (The Second Season). Instead of adapting the manga’s storyline, Studio Pierrot created an original story that contradicted Ishida’s work. This led to major confusion, especially for fans of the manga, as key character motivations and plot points were altered or ignored. The most notorious example is Kaneki’s decision to join Aogiri Tree in √A, which was completely different from his motivations in the manga. This change made his character arc feel nonsensical and left fans frustrated.
The ‘Tokyo Ghoul’ manga is known for its psychological depth, exploring themes of identity, humanity, and moral ambiguity. However, the anime often failed to convey these themes effectively. Many of the manga’s most emotional and philosophical moments were either cut or rushed, leading to a lack of depth in storytelling. As a result, the anime felt like a surface-level version of what made the manga so compelling.
Another major flaw of the anime was its rushed pacing. The manga had time to properly develop characters and world-building, allowing readers to immerse themselves in the story. The anime, however, condensed major arcs into just a few episodes, leaving out crucial details. This became even worse in ‘Tokyo Ghoul:re’, which tried to cram over 150 chapters of content into just 24 episodes. As a result, many character developments and emotional moments felt shallow, and the story became hard to follow, especially for anime-only viewers.
Due to the rushed adaptation, many characters in the anime felt underdeveloped compared to their manga counterparts. Kaneki’s transformation from a timid college student to a powerful, conflicted figure was a highlight of the manga, but in the anime, his growth felt abrupt and unearned. Important side characters like Eto, Arima, and Takizawa, who had rich backstories and strong character arcs in the manga, were sidelined or barely explored in the anime. This lack of proper character development made it difficult for viewers to connect with them emotionally.
If that wasn’t bad enough, ‘Tokyo Ghoul’ had some visually striking moments, it was also plagued by inconsistent animation quality. Studio Pierrot, known for handling multiple projects simultaneously, did not allocate enough resources to ensure a consistently high-quality production. Fight scenes, which were crucial to the series, often felt lackluster due to poor choreography and frequent censorship. The infamous dark censorship in many episodes made it difficult to see what was happening on screen, reducing the impact of key action sequences.
While ‘Tokyo Ghoul’ remains a beloved franchise, its anime adaptation ultimately failed to do justice to the manga. Poor adaptation choices, rushed pacing, weak character development, production issues, and a disappointing conclusion all contributed to its downfall. For many fans, the best way to truly experience the story is to read the manga, as the anime fails to capture the depth and brilliance of Ishida’s original work. The anime is now infamous for being a textbook case of how NOT to adapt a beloved manga.
Redo of Healer (2021)
‘Redo of Healer’ (2021) is one of the most controversial anime series in recent years due to its extreme themes of revenge, violence, and sexual assault. Adapted from the light novel by Rui Tsukiyo, the anime follows Keyaru, a healer who is repeatedly abused, exploited, and tortured by those around him. After discovering a way to reset time, he vows to take revenge on those who wronged him, using his healing abilities to manipulate, control, and punish his former tormentors. The series’ depiction of graphic violence and sexual content sparked heated debates among anime fans, critics, and moral watchdogs.
One of the main sources of controversy stems from the anime’s use of sexual violence as a core narrative device. Keyaru, having suffered horrific abuse, enacts his revenge by subjecting his abusers to similar or worse fates. The explicit scenes of coercion and degradation, especially against female characters, led to accusations that the series glorifies revenge-driven sexual assault. While the story presents these actions as part of a dark fantasy narrative, many viewers found them deeply disturbing and inappropriate, arguing that the anime crosses ethical boundaries.
Defenders of ‘Redo of Healer’ argue that the series is a form of extreme revenge fantasy, similar to other dark stories in anime and literature. Some fans believe that, while the execution is controversial, the premise explores the psychological impact of trauma and the desire for justice in a brutal world. Others suggest that the series is intentionally provocative, pushing boundaries in a way that challenges traditional storytelling norms. However, critics counter that the show fails to meaningfully address the consequences of its themes, instead using them for shock value and exploitation.
The backlash against ‘Redo of Healer’ led to restrictions in multiple countries. Some streaming platforms, including major anime distributors, refused to carry the show, while others only offered a heavily censored version. In Japan, the anime aired with significant modifications to its most graphic content, though uncensored versions were made available through alternative platforms. Western anime communities were divided, with some arguing for free artistic expression and others calling for the show to be banned.
Despite the controversy, ‘Redo of Healer’ gained a dedicated following, particularly among fans of dark fantasy and revenge stories. Its popularity, fuelled in part by the backlash, led to strong sales of the light novel and manga adaptations. Rui Tsukiyo, the original author, defended the series, claiming it was a work of fiction meant for a specific audience, not a reflection of real-world morality. However, this did little to quell the debate over whether the anime was pushing the limits of acceptable storytelling too far.
In the end, ‘Redo of Healer’ remains one of the most divisive anime of its time. While some see it as an unflinching portrayal of vengeance and survival, others condemn it as exploitative and harmful. The debate over its themes reflects larger discussions in anime and entertainment about the balance between artistic freedom and ethical responsibility. Whether regarded as a guilty pleasure or a step too far, ‘Redo of Healer’ is unlikely to be forgotten anytime soon.
Nice Boat (2007)
The “Nice Boat” controversy is one of the most infamous moments in anime history, originating from the unexpected censorship of the final episode of ‘School Days’ in 2007. ‘School Days’, an anime adaptation of the visual novel of the same name, is known for its dramatic and violent conclusion, a stark contrast to its initially typical romance setup. However, due to real-life events that coincided with the episode’s scheduled airing, the final episode was replaced with unrelated footage, leading to the now-famous “Nice Boat” meme.
The final episode of ‘School Days’ (2007) was scheduled to air on September 18, 2007. However, just before its broadcast, a gruesome real-life crime occurred in Japan: a teenage girl murdered her father with an axe. Given the striking similarities between this incident and the violent content of the anime’s conclusion, the network, TV Kanagawa, decided to pull the episode from its broadcast schedule to avoid insensitivity. Instead of airing the finale, the channel displayed a slideshow of scenic landscapes accompanied by calming music.
One particular image from this replacement broadcast featured a tranquil lake with a boat in the distance. This seemingly random image, completely disconnected from School Days, became an instant hit among fans who were eagerly anticipating the shocking finale. The phrase “Nice Boat” was born when an anonymous internet user sarcastically commented on the serene scene. The meme quickly spread across anime forums and message boards, cementing itself as an iconic reference within the anime community.
Despite the last-minute censorship, the final episode of ‘School Days’ was later released on DVD and aired on other networks. Fans were finally able to witness the full extent of the anime’s shocking conclusion, which involved graphic depictions of violence. Over time, the “Nice Boat” meme evolved beyond its original context and became a shorthand way to refer to unexpectedly censored or replaced content in anime and other media.
The “Nice Boat” controversy remains a significant moment in anime history, demonstrating the power of internet culture to transform a censorship decision into a lasting meme.
The Promised Neverland (2019 – 2022)
The second season of ‘The Promised Neverland’ in 2022 was one of the most controversial anime sequels in recent years, leaving many fans deeply disappointed. Following the success of the first season, which faithfully adapted Kaiu Shirai’s critically acclaimed manga, expectations were sky-high. However, the second season took a drastically different approach by significantly deviating from the source material, resulting in a rushed and unsatisfying conclusion that angered both manga readers and anime-only viewers alike.
One of the biggest complaints about the second season was the removal of key arcs from the manga, most notably the Goldy Pond Battle Arc. This arc was a fan favorite, introducing new characters, intense action sequences, and deeper world-building that would have expanded on the horrors outside Grace Field House. By cutting such a significant portion of the story, the anime lost much of its tension and character development, leaving viewers feeling disconnected from the stakes of Emma and her friends’ journey. Instead, the season opted for a condensed, fast-paced narrative that skipped over crucial moments and characters, including several major antagonists.
Another major issue was the pacing. While the first season took its time to build suspense, mystery, and emotional depth, the second season rushed through the story, attempting to cover a vast amount of content in just 11 episodes. This led to shallow storytelling and underdeveloped character arcs. Complex themes such as morality, survival, and sacrifice, which were so central to the first season and manga, were barely explored. The decision to conclude the entire story in a single season, rather than following a multi-season approach, left many fans feeling like the adaptation was incomplete and poorly executed.
Perhaps the most frustrating aspect for many fans was the ending. In contrast to the manga’s more detailed and emotional resolution, the anime’s finale was heavily criticised for its slideshow-style montage that skipped over key moments. Instead of fully animating crucial events, the series resorted to showing static images, essentially summarising what happened rather than allowing viewers to experience it organically. This made the conclusion feel rushed and unearned, leaving fans feeling robbed of a proper ending.
The controversy surrounding the second season of ‘The Promised Neverland’ was further intensified by the fact that the manga’s original creator, Kaiu Shirai, was reportedly involved in the anime’s scriptwriting. While some initially hoped this meant a more polished adaptation, it instead led to confusion as to why such drastic changes were made. Many speculated that studio CloverWorks faced production constraints or was pressured to wrap up the series quickly, but regardless of the reasons, the end result was widely considered a major letdown.
Overall, ‘The Promised Neverland’ stands as a cautionary tale of how poor adaptation choices can damage a beloved series. While the first season was praised for its gripping storytelling and faithfulness to the manga, the second season squandered much of that goodwill. What could have been an incredible continuation of an already strong series instead became an infamous example of rushed pacing and missed potential, leaving fans with a bitter taste and a lingering sense of disappointment.
Dio & The Quran (2008)
The ‘JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure’ controversy involving Dio Brando and the Quran is one of the most well-known instances of anime censorship and cultural sensitivity issues. This controversy emerged in 2008, during the release of the ‘JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure: Stardust Crusaders OVA’ (Original Video Animation). Fans quickly noticed a scene where Dio, the series’ primary antagonist, was seen reading a book that contained Arabic text resembling verses from the Quran. This inclusion led to significant backlash, particularly from Muslim audiences, who found it highly offensive that a villainous character like Dio was depicted holding what appeared to be Islamic scripture.
The issue was exacerbated by the fact that Dio is portrayed as a ruthless and immoral character, one who engages in horrific acts throughout the series. Associating him with a sacred religious text, even unintentionally, was seen as deeply disrespectful. As a result of the controversy, ‘JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure’ faced criticism from various Muslim communities, with some even calling for the series to be banned or censored. The backlash was strong enough that it led to changes in future adaptations of the story.
In response to the criticism, Shueisha, the publisher of ‘JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure’, and the anime studio responsible for the adaptation issued an apology. They acknowledged that the inclusion of the text was unintentional and that there was no deliberate attempt to offend religious sentiments. The scene was subsequently altered in later releases, and efforts were made to ensure that future adaptations of ‘JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure’ did not contain similar content that could be seen as offensive.
When ‘JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure’ was adapted into a full TV anime by David Production in 2014, the studio took extra precautions to avoid any similar controversies. In the Stardust Crusaders arc, the scene in question was completely removed, and Dio was not shown with any book containing religious text. Additionally, some of Dio’s other actions and settings were adjusted to be more culturally sensitive. This incident highlighted the importance of being mindful of religious and cultural symbols in media, particularly in a globalised entertainment landscape where anime reaches audiences far beyond Japan.
The Dio and Quran controversy serves as a cautionary tale about unintended religious insensitivity in media. While ‘JoJo’s Bizarre Adventure’ remains a beloved series worldwide, this controversy is a reminder that creators must be careful when incorporating real-world religious texts and symbols into fictional narratives. It also showcases how fans and cultural groups can influence changes in media through vocal feedback and criticism.
Interspecies Reviewers (2020)
‘Interspecies Reviewers’ (2020) is an ecchi fantasy anime based on the manga of the same name by Amahara and illustrated by masha. The story follows a group of adventurers who travel across a fantasy world to visit different brothels, each staffed by various fantasy species such as elves, succubi, and cyclops girls. Their goal is to “review” these establishments and rate their experiences, leading to highly sexualised and comedic scenarios.
The anime became one of the most controversial titles of 2020 due to its explicit content. While labeled as an ecchi (softcore erotic) series, ‘Interspecies Reviewers’ pushed boundaries far beyond what is typically seen in mainstream anime. It featured nudity, highly suggestive scenes, and an overall premise that revolved entirely around sexual experiences. This level of content led to multiple streaming services and networks removing the show from their platforms.
Funimation, which initially licensed the series for English streaming, dropped it after just a few episodes, stating that it “fell outside [their] standards.” Amazon Prime and even Tokyo MX, a Japanese television network, also removed the show, effectively canceling its broadcast in many regions. The controversy grew as fans debated whether the show was unjustly censored or simply too explicit for mainstream distribution.
Despite—or perhaps because of—its controversy, Interspecies Reviewers gained a cult following. Some fans appreciated its over-the-top humour, unique premise, and unapologetic approach to adult content. They argued that the show was upfront about its nature and that anyone watching it should have known what to expect. Additionally, some viewers praised it for being an oddly well-animated and genuinely creative parody of fantasy and isekai tropes.
On the other hand, many anime fans strongly disliked ‘Interspecies Reviewers.’ Some criticised it for being nothing more than softcore hentai disguised as a regular anime. Others found the humour repetitive, the premise uncomfortable, or the focus on sex too excessive. The removal of the show from streaming platforms also fuelled debates about censorship and whether companies should dictate what kind of content is acceptable for audiences.
Even after its cancellation, ‘Interspecies Reviewers’ remains infamous within the anime community. It became a symbol of how anime content can challenge platform policies and raise debates over censorship, freedom of expression, and the limits of ecchi content. Some fans still champion it as an example of unfiltered creative expression, while others see it as a show that deserved to be banned due to its extreme nature.
Ultimately, ‘Interspecies Reviewers’ is remembered as a polarising anime that pushed the boundaries of what mainstream anime could depict. Whether seen as a misunderstood comedic gem or an excessive work that crossed too many lines, it left a significant mark on anime discourse in 2020.
Electric Soldier Porygon (1997)
‘Electric Soldier Porygon’ is one of the most infamous incidents in television history, particularly in the anime industry. The controversy stems from the 38th episode of the ‘Pokémon’ (1999), titled ‘Dennō Senshi Porygon’ (Electric Soldier Porygon), which aired in Japan on December 16, 1997. This episode became notorious for causing seizures in hundreds of viewers due to a particular animation effect, leading to widespread panic and significant consequences for the franchise.
During the episode, Ash and his friends travel into cyberspace to help a Porygon fix a computer system that had been disrupted by Team Rocket. At one point, Pikachu uses an attack to destroy incoming missiles, triggering a rapid flashing red and blue strobe effect. This effect, known as “paka paka” in Japan, lasted for about four seconds and was particularly intense. The combination of bright, quickly alternating red and blue lights at a high frequency (around 12 Hz) overstimulated the visual cortex of some viewers, leading to a condition called photosensitive epilepsy.
Immediately after the episode aired, nearly 700 children across Japan reportedly experienced symptoms such as dizziness, headaches, nausea, and even seizures. Around 150 of them were hospitalised, and while most recovered quickly, the sheer scale of the reaction led to a nationwide alarm. The incident was widely covered by Japanese news outlets, and the broadcast of the ‘Pokémon’ was promptly suspended for four months while investigations took place.
In response to the incident, Pokémon producers, including TV Tokyo and the show’s animators, faced intense scrutiny. The network quickly took steps to prevent similar occurrences in future broadcasts. Although the effect was a common animation technique in Japanese media, it became apparent that the intensity and duration in ‘Electric Soldier Porygon’ were excessive. As a result, new regulations were introduced in the anime industry to limit the use of flashing lights and strobe effects.
Even though Pikachu was responsible for the attack that caused the problematic visuals, Porygon was unfairly blamed for the incident, leading to the virtual removal of the Pokémon from future episodes. Porygon and its evolutions, Porygon2 and Porygon-Z, have since been largely absent from the ‘Pokémon’, with only minor appearances in non-animated media such as games and merchandise.
The ‘Electric Soldier Porygon’ incident led to widespread discussions about the effects of animation on viewers, particularly children. It prompted the Japanese government and the anime industry to establish stricter guidelines regarding the use of flashing visuals. These guidelines influenced not only ‘Pokémon’ but also other anime productions worldwide. In later years, broadcasters implemented safety measures such as dimming bright lights and avoiding rapid colour changes to prevent similar incidents.
Additionally, the controversy affected Pokémon‘s international rollout. The episode was never officially aired outside of Japan, and when the anime resumed its broadcasts months later, producers were more cautious about visual effects. The incident remains a case study in media safety regulations, with researchers using it to better understand photosensitive epilepsy and how to create safer visual media.
Despite the passage of time, the ‘Electric Soldier Porygon’ incident remains an infamous moment in ‘Pokémon’ history. It serves as a reminder of the responsibilities that media creators have in ensuring the safety of their audiences. While the Pokémon anime has continued to thrive for decades, the absence of Porygon from the series still sparks discussions among fans about the long-term consequences of the incident.
The Ending of Neon Genesis Evangelion (1995)
The ending of ‘Neon Genesis Evangelion’ has been a subject of debate and controversy since it first aired in 1996. The original series concluded with episodes 25 and 26, which took a deeply psychological and abstract approach to resolving the story. Instead of depicting a traditional, external battle between protagonist Shinji Ikari and the external threats of NERV, the finale took place almost entirely within Shinji’s mind. It explored themes of self-identity, depression, and human connection through fragmented visuals, philosophical dialogue, and surreal imagery. While some fans appreciated this introspective conclusion and its focus on Shinji’s inner growth, many others were frustrated by the lack of resolution for the show’s larger plot lines, particularly regarding the apocalyptic events happening in the outside world.
Due to backlash from fans who felt the ending was incomplete or unsatisfying, creator Hideaki Anno and Studio Gainax responded with ‘The End of Evangelion’ (1997), a feature-length film that provided an alternative and more traditional resolution to the series. Instead of a purely psychological journey, the movie depicted the full-scale destruction of humanity through the Third Impact event. The film’s second half takes a nightmarish, apocalyptic turn, filled with surreal and disturbing imagery as Shinji is forced to make a final decision about the fate of existence itself. The ending of the film remains ambiguous—Shinji seemingly rejects Instrumentality (the merging of all human souls into one consciousness), choosing individuality and separation instead. The final scene, where he and Asuka Langley Soryu are the only apparent survivors, has led to countless interpretations, as it neither provides clear answers nor a sense of traditional closure.
In response to the fan’s backlash & dissatisfaction with series’ ending, Anno decided to create ‘The End of Evangelion’, a theatrical film that served as both a retelling and a more “complete” conclusion to the series. However, rather than offering a neat and conventional resolution, the film was even more disturbing and ambiguous, reflecting the anger, disappointment, and fanaticism of the audience itself.
If that wasn’t shocking enough, the creator of ‘Neon Genesis Evangelion’ and ‘The End of Evangelion’, Hideaki Anno, received numerous death threats following the original airing of the anime and the release of the film in 1997, as Anno and the animation studio, Gainax, were bombarded with hate mail, including direct death threats from enraged fans. Some went so far as to vandalize Gainax’s offices with graffiti that included violent messages directed at Anno. Some even accused Anno of “ruining” the story by seemingly replacing an action-packed climax with abstract, budget-restricted animation and philosophical monologues.
Both endings—of the series and the movie—are controversial in different ways. The original series ending was seen as too abstract and lacking in narrative resolution, while ‘The End of Evangelion’ was criticised for its bleakness and disturbing content. Some fans believe the film was Anno’s direct response to the backlash, incorporating a harsh and cynical view of human nature and even punishing the audience for their desire for a more straightforward conclusion. However, Evangelion remains one of the most analyzed and debated works in anime history, proving that its impact has endured far beyond its initial release.
