Sports betting tipsters — today, this query in Google may rival the search frequency for the legal betting platforms themselves. And it’s no surprise.
People lean towards betting tips for guidance in placing bets. All want to get a football forecast with hints about the outcome of a match and what bet is recommended to make.
Good tips are useful because they offer unique insights about market options, strategies for wagering on specific tournaments or athletes, and their thoughts can be used to make your own market picks. Checking professional sports predictions, such as a Clubsport prediction for football for instance, could be another piece in the betting puzzle.
There is a huge number of tipsters available, all putting information out into a crowded market. Tips are designed to give punters a shortcut to potentially making a strong selection, as well as getting the best odds from betting sites, because not all odds are equally advantageous for the same event.
But there are some red flags to watch out for while trying to select the best tipster, especially when it comes to those who produce tips for many sports.
Can’t Be an Expert in Everything
The main thing that clouds the picture of a tipster who generates tips for multiple sports is that they are unlikely to be experts in everything. Think about your betting – you are mostly going to be locked into one niche, whether that’s football, MMA or horse racing. You may well like football and F1, but you will likely know a lot more about one than the other and be more confident in your ability when betting.
It would be difficult because of time constraints and having to research an overwhelming amount of statistics to get to a point of confident, productive betting on many different sports. That problem is further compounded when those different sports are happening at the same time.
The jack-of-all-trades approach by tipsters can be very off-putting because of this. At best, it suggests nothing more than a surface-level interest in the different sports, instead of deep knowledge and understanding.
They May Not Understand the Odds
Finding odds value for bets is as important as the quality of the tips themselves. It’s easy enough for a tipster to mention a lot of odds-on favourites in the hope of generating high success rates with outcomes. But that’s of little value to a punter who is looking for real value by exploiting bookmaker positions.
A 2/1 away underdog in a football match, for example, is a much different proposition than a 2/1 runner in a horse race. The odds are the same, with the same implied probability, but they are not equal.
The horse is a more likely winner than the football underdog, for example, and misjudging odds can come from not having full in-depth working knowledge. There’s a good chance that a tipster who looks at multiple sports is just going to see the odds for what they are and not understand their true value.
Quantity over Quality
A tipster who has a focus on different sports is also probably guilty of just producing quantity over quality, when it should be the other way around. Just producing tips for the sake of producing tips doesn’t help punters in any way.
It may have more appeal to a wider audience, but the likelihood is that if a tipster is releasing 500 daily tips, the quality of those is going to be diluted. It would be better to get 5 high-quality, well-researched tips that are also focused on odds value instead.
Money Makers
There are ways that tipsters make money from their outputs. That can be through a monthly subscription, or selling bundles of Premier League tips, for example. If it is a tipster that’s selling their work, then naturally they want as high of a volume of sales as possible.
So by appealing to Rugby, NFL and football fans alike, they have a chance of making more money. Also don’t believe in wild claims like a tipster having “secret inside information”, trying to sell their system, or giving out contradicting tips because everyone else is “wrong” . Those are major red flags.
Abuse of Trust
Another alarm when it comes to a tipster who claims to know about multiple sports is an abuse of trust. If the tipster is just producing low-quality tips, then they are undercutting the trust that punters should have in them.
Punters actively seek information that can help them, and generic tips that haven’t been well researched, will undermine them. The user has to be able to trust the source of the tips, which again, is where quality counts.
If integrity isn’t there to start with, then people are going to question other things, like how true are the positive reviews about the tipster. Can their transparency of results be trusted?
